http://ens.lycos.com/ens/feb2002/2002L-02-27-06.html
Environment News Service:
Mad Cow Disease Could Slip Into U.S.

By Cat Lazaroff

WASHINGTON, DC, February 27, 2002 (ENS) - Federal actions aimed at 
preventing mad cow disease from entering the United States do not 
ensure that the disease will be kept out, finds a new report by the 
General Accounting Office. The report by the investigative arm of 
Congress also warns that the U.S. could not guarantee rapid detection 
of the disease if it did cross the nation's borders.

Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), commonly known as mad cow 
disease, is an always fatal, neuro-degenerative disease that has been 
found in cattle in 23 countries around the world. Cattle contract the 
disease through animal feed that contains protein derived from the 
remains of diseased animals.

Scientists generally believe an equally fatal disease in humans - 
known as variant Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease (vCJD) - is linked to 
eating beef from cattle infected with BSE. Just over 100 people have 
died from vCJD, one of a family of diseases known as transmissible 
spongiform encephalopathies.

Both diseases have long incubation periods during which they are 
undetectable - two to eight years in cattle and possibly up to 30 
years in humans.

For more than a decade, the federal agencies responsible for ensuring 
the safety of the public and the nation's food supply have been 
working to prevent BSE from entering the U.S., and creating 
mechanisms for detecting and tracking the disease if it should appear 
here.

But a new report from the General Accounting Office (GAO) finds that 
while BSE has not yet been found in the United States, "federal 
actions do not sufficiently ensure that all BSE infected animals or 
products are kept out or that if BSE were found, it would be detected 
promptly and not spread to other cattle through animal feed or enter 
the human food supply."

Despite regulations which bar imports of beef from countries where 
the disease has been found, tons of beef has entered the U.S. from 
such nations, because it was imported before the disease was 
detected. In fact, the United States has imported about 125 million 
pounds of beef and about 1,000 cattle from countries that later 
discovered BSE - during the period when BSE would have been 
incubating in those nations.

In addition, new sources of BSE contamination may continue to enter 
the U.S., because of weaknesses in import controls such as an 
insufficient number of inspectors and inspection facilities to manage 
a growing load of overseas imports.

The GAO report was requested by three U.S. Senators last fall, after 
a report by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis concluded that BSE 
is extremely unlikely to become established in the United States and 
that, if introduced here, it would be eliminated within 20 years.

The authors of that study acknowledged that their conclusions were 
based on a number of assumptions, including confidence in U.S. 
measures to prevent the introduction and spread of BSE.

The new report by the GAO casts doubt on the Harvard conclusions, and 
suggests further measures that federal agencies should take to keep 
BSE out of the U.S.

For example, the report notes that the United States has a more 
permissive feed ban than other countries - one that bars proteins 
from cattle, pigs and chickens, but allows cattle feed to contain 
proteins from horses and pigs. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 
is now reviewing whether these ingredients should also be banned in 
cattle feed.

Banned feed products may still be served at some cattle ranches, the GAO found.

"FDA has not acted promptly to compel firms to keep prohibited 
proteins out of cattle feed and to label animal feed that cannot be 
fed to cattle," the report notes.

Calling FDA's data on inspections "severely flawed," the GAO said it 
found some noncompliant firms "that had not been reinspected for two 
or more years and instances when no enforcement action had occurred 
even though the firms had been found noncompliant on multiple 
inspections."

These inspection lapses could put the public at risk, the GAO 
explained, because "consumers do not always know when foods and other 
products they use may contain central nervous system tissue, which, 
according to scientific experts, could pose a health risk if taken 
from diseased animals."

As in most countries that are BSE free, the United States allows 
cattle brains and other central nervous system tissue to be sold as 
human food.

The GAO also criticized the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), 
noting it does not test many animals that die on farms, despite the 
fact that experts consider these animals to be a high risk population 
for BSE.

However, the GAO recognized that the USDA acted as many as five years 
earlier than other countries to impose controls over imports of 
animals and animal feed ingredients from countries that had 
experienced BSE.

Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman defended the agency's efforts, 
saying the USDA and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) 
"have been aggressive and proactive for well over a decade to prevent 
BSE from entering the United States."

"While we support the GAO's efforts to examine ways to strengthen the 
government's ongoing efforts to prevent BSE, the report fails to 
appropriately recognize the conclusions and recommendations made last 
year by Harvard University in its comprehensive, three year study on 
BSE," Veneman said. The USDA is now supporting a peer review of the 
Harvard study to determine the accuracy of the approaches and 
assumptions of its models.

"In examining recommendations, the GAO report does not appropriately 
consider the additional actions that have been taken by federal 
agencies to strengthen BSE programs," Veneman added.

Last year, Veneman and HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson outlined a series 
of actions to reduce the risk of BSE entering the U.S., including 
doubling testing for BSE in cattle this year, and adding tests of 
cattle that die on farms.

Increased funding proposed by the Bush administration would boost 
surveillance efforts and increase the number of inspectors available 
to test imported goods for BSE.

"We continue to take strong actions and keep our vigilance high to 
prevent this disease from entering this country," said Thompson. "If 
we ever did face a situation, we want to ensure that strong systems 
are in place to prevent its potential spread to the animal or human 
food chain."

So far, no cases of BSE have been detected in the U.S. However, in 
March 2001, a flock of sheep infected with a condition closely 
related to mad cow disease was confiscated from a Vermont farm by the 
USDA.

The economic impacts of a BSE outbreak in the United States could be 
severe, according to federal economists. Beef exports and domestic 
beef consumption would drop, with many consumers refusing to eat beef 
served at U.S. restaurants or available in U.S. made products.

Regarding effects on human health, "If BSE infected cattle were to 
enter the food supply, some people might develop vCJD," warned the 
GAO. "However, experts disagree about the number of people who would 
be affected. While many believe that vCJD is very difficult to 
contract, so that relatively few people would develop it, some 
experts believe that, because of the long incubation period, no one 
can predict whether few or many might contract vCJD."

The GAO recommends that the USDA and FDA take steps to strengthen 
enforcement of the feed ban, develop a coordinated strategy to 
increase inspections of imported goods, and alert consumers when 
products may contain central nervous system tissue.

For more information about BSE, visit: http://www.aphis/usda.gov



You can find the GOA report here:
http://www.gao.gov/daybook/020226.htm

"2. Mad Cow Disease: Improvements in the Animal Feed Ban and Other 
Regulatory Areas Would Strengthen U.S. Prevention Efforts. 
GAO-02-183, January 25."
Download pdf (1.7Mb)
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02183.pdf

Comment yesterday from a US farmer:

"The GAO report is lengthy. But it also shows how little communication is
occurring between the international community of researchers, agencies, and
governments with regard to BSE.  Still we are 'BSE free' until someone uses
the Freedom of Information Act to gather the truth on BSE in the U.S."

The US farmer quoted above also said this:

"Cattle feed can contain protein from horses and pigs.  The EU has 
already stated that they can infect mice with infected protein from 
cattle.  Does it make sense to continue to feed our food supply with 
substances that could or will cause infection?  The FDA is reviewing 
this practice.  I translate that as they are talking with the 
syndicated rendering companies to see how they can get out of having 
to cut into their revenue stream."

That's probably not unrealistic.

"Prior USDA half-measures halted live imports and forbade rendered 
ruminant feeding (cow-to-cow; sheep-to-cow; deer-to-cow), though 
rendered cow-to-pig or cow-to-chicken and then back to cow are still 
permitted in spite of vocal objections from consumer groups.

"The USDA memo above seems to answer the question once and for all of 
whether the US has had a comprehensive ban in place ... during 
1985-2000: no. Ironically, the banned items probably have less 
infectivity now than they did during the peak BSE years when 
importation was at full swing. This is locking the barn door after 
the horse is gone."

- From "Prion Disease: US finally bans UK bone meal in December 2000"
http://www.mad-cow.org/00/dec00_late_news.html

The Campaign for Food Safety, a Minnesota-based national network 
funded by individuals and foundations interested in organic food, 
sayus the US leads the world in "feeding animals to animals."

The United Nations warned a year ago that all countries that imported 
potentially contaminated meat and bone meal from the UK were at risk 
of harbouring BSE. The
U.S. imported 20 tons of it.
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?view=2540&list=BIOFUEL

Of the 3 million tons of meal produced by the European Union, an 
estimated 500,000 tons was exported, mostly to Eastern Europe, Asia 
and the US.

* Feed mills. If BSE does exist undiagnosed somewhere in the nation's
cattle or dairy herds, there's a chance that it could be spread by
mix-ups at feed mills, some of which have been lax in following
regulations aimed at stopping BSE. The disease was spread in Europe
through contaminated animal feed.

* Imports. American companies imported feed from Britain made of
rendered animals for three years after BSE was diagnosed there in
1986. Moreover, over the past decade, 32 cows were shipped in from
Britain that U.S. Department of Agriculture officials can't account
for.

* Inadequate testing. Although 12,000 so-called downer cattle, or
cattle that could not walk on their own when they were brought in for
slaughter, were destroyed in the U.S. this decade and their brains
tested for BSE, some industry observers believe that is not enough to
guarantee that U.S. herds are free of the disease. There is no test
that can detect the disease in live animals.

http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?view=2863&list=BIOFUEL

I really hope the US _is_ BSE-free as claimed, and will stay that 
way, but if so it'll be more a matter of sheer luck than foresight, 
good judgment and good management, which aren't any more evident 
there than in other countries which were over-confident (or simply 
covering it up).

Here's one answer: "European Union Goes Organic to Tackle BSE Scare":
http://ens.lycos.com/ens/feb2001/2001L-02-13-11.html

Meanwhile, what seems on offer is a glut of cheap or free (or better) 
tallow. And not much competition for your WVO from the collectors and 
recyclers, since their big market is animal feed mills, and most WVO 
probably contains animal fats. Prions survive cooking, they're more 
resistant to steam sterilization than other disease agents, extremely 
resistant to dry heat (360 deg C for one hour is not completely 
effective), and they survive irradiation.

It was reported a year ago that the value of collected WV0 in the UK 
had dropped by more than half and collection companies were going out 
of business. An EU directive stopping WVO being recycled into animal 
feedstuffs is expected later this year.

A list member reported last August: "I am working in New York, close 
to the state capital of Albany. The market for tallow from rendering 
companies has all but dried up. Our  rendering contractor produces 
some 900 million Lbs. per year plus another 900  million Lbs. of MRM 
(Machine Recovered Meat). Primary use for both has been  animal feeds 
but with the BSE scare (Mad Cow), those markets have  disappeared. 
The price for tallow has collapsed."


Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Osaka, Japan
http://journeytoforever.org/

 








------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/iZp8OC/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/9bTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://www.webconx.com/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to