Hakan, If only one of the cohabitants were married, I think that would satisfy the letter of the law. But with the "high moral values" of the majority of citizens (especially the followers of TV evangelists like Pat Robertson), these two might get linched for living in sin!
As far as being the "land of the free," Goethe said it best - "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." We are only as free as the governments let us be... BTW, thank goodness I am married (to my cohabitant). I wouldn't want to give the police, or the linch mob, any reason to come take me (or my wife) away. Thanks for the brief respite from bioenergy and "serious" politics. Earl Kinsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <Biofuel@sustainablelists.org> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Robertson et al VS. followers > > Mike, > > Never heard about it before. LOL > This is fantastic, a long time since I had such a good laugh. > Not since Bush said that they did the best to kill their own military. LOL > > In a range of "...so do we" statements, he actually said. > "They try their best to kill our people, so do we". LOL > > Is it enough that one of them are married? > > Do they have to be married to each other, or just married? > > Amazing!!!!!! How can they call it the "land of the free", when it is > against the law to be free? > > Hakan > > At 14:28 29/08/2005, you wrote: > >>Hakan: "To condition the cohabitation of a men and a women on if they are >>married or not?" >> >>"Unmarried cohabitation. Eight states continue to make it a crime >>for an unmarried man and a woman to cohabit together: Florida, >>Idaho, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, North Dakota, Virginia >>and West Virginia fall into this category." >> >><http://www.unmarriedamerica.org/Court/privacy-ruling.htm>http://www.unmarriedamerica.org/Court/privacy-ruling.htm >> >>Hakan Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Mike, >> >>I did not know of the sedition act of 1918: >>"...shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, >>profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government >>of the United States, or the Constitution of the United States..." >> >>This make any talk about "freedom of speech" a joke. >> >>The unravelling of the lack of democracy, has never been so obvious >>as the execution and results from the two last elections and the way >>the Iraqi war has been pursued. I still think that "Corprocracy" is a >>better word for the governing method of US. >> >>It seems that we have to change the phrase "the nation of the free" >>to "the nation of the blind". >> >>To condition the cohabitation of a men and a women on if they are >>married or not? Do they have to be married to each other, or just >>married? Is it enough if onl! y one of them is married? This info I >>keep as one of the most bizarre I have. LOL >> >>Hakan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Biofuel mailing list > Biofuel@sustainablelists.org > http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org > > Biofuel at Journey to Forever: > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html > > Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 > messages): > http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ > > _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
