So who gets to decide what is 'good for humanity'? Oh yeah rushing to the marketplace with unproven (or should I say under studied) technologies is a GREAT idea. Let's see where that will lead us. Just out of curiosity do you happen to work for Monsanto? If not I think they would be interested in hiring you for their PR department. You put a lot more faith in science than you should be comfortable with here. (IMO)
Joe Y. K. JAIN wrote: > Dear all, > > I feel the controversy over whether the established theory is correct > or the new theory is correct, is meaningless at the stage where Dr. > Mills claims to have practically made (?)something which is good for > humanity. In case it is really possible to generate large amounts of > energy with miniscule amounts of fuel, let this be done and devices > mass produced in the form of energy generators. The scientists, in the > course of time, will automatically settle scores among themselves and > come to some understanding. It really does not matter whether a > scientist, howsoever reputed and considered great (even greatest on > earth) disagrees with something actually happening. It is not easy for > an egoist to accept defeat even if the facts indicate that. > > Y. K. Jain > > > _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
