Just one question on the environmental sustainability of these plants. How 
much ethanol do they produce for your 300 tonnes of coal?
Bob
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Biofuel@sustainablelists.org>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] A Carbon Cloud Hangs Over Green Fuel


>
> I am not surprised at all, that coal is going to be a preferred
> choice for ethanol distillation. It is a very logical choice for US
> sustainability, but maybe not for the environment sustainability. The
> reasons are,
>
> 1. US have around a third of the worlds coal reserves.
> 2. US is running out of Natural Gas, wether it is from US, Canada or 
> Mexico.
> 3. US have little resources of NG ships or terminals.
> 4. It is probably the easiest process to liquidize the coal reserves.
> 5. Using oil to distill ethanol is not efficient nor sustainable.
>
> The interest of using ethanol is probably not based on environmental
> aspects, but rather to lessen the oil dependence. To use the
> supporters of ethanol as clean fuel, is rater a marketing byproduct
> than a goal. Maybe you could call this ethanol, distilled with coal,
> "dirty ethanol". It will however lessen the oil dependence, based on
> an abundant domestic energy resource.
>
> Hakan
>
> At 11:07 27/03/2006, you wrote:
>>http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/33969/
>>
>>A Carbon Cloud Hangs Over Green Fuel
>>
>>By Mark Clayton, Christian Science Monitor. Posted March 25, 2006.
>>
>>An Iowa corn refinery, open since December, uses 300 tons of coal a
>>day to make ethanol. So just how green can it be?
>>
>>Late last year in Goldfield, Iowa, a refinery began pumping out a
>>stream of ethanol, which supporters call the clean, renewable fuel of
>>the future.
>>
>>There's just one twist: The plant is burning 300 tons of coal a day
>>to turn corn into ethanol -- the first US plant of its kind to use
>>coal instead of cleaner natural gas.
>>
>>An hour south of Goldfield, another coal-fired ethanol plant is under
>>construction in Nevada, Iowa. At least three other such refineries
>>are being built in Montana, North Dakota, and Minnesota.
>>
>>The trend, which is expected to continue, has left even some ethanol
>>boosters scratching their heads. Should coal become a standard for 30
>>to 40 ethanol plants under construction -- and 150 others on the
>>drawing boards -- it would undermine the environmental reasoning for
>>switching to ethanol in the first place, environmentalists say.
>>
>>"If the biofuels industry is going to depend on coal, and these
>>conversion plants release their CO2 to the air, it could undo the
>>global warming benefits of using ethanol," says David Hawkins,
>>climate director for the Natural Resources Defense Council in
>>Washington.
>>
>>The reason for the shift is purely economic. Natural gas has long
>>been the ethanol industry's fuel of choice. But with natural gas
>>prices soaring, talk of coal power for new ethanol plants and
>>retrofitting existing refineries for coal is growing, observers say.
>>
>>"It just made great economic sense to use coal," says Brad Davis,
>>general manager of the Gold-Eagle Cooperative that manages the Corn
>>LP plant, which is farmer and investor owned. "Clean coal"
>>technology, he adds, helps the Goldfield refinery easily meet
>>pollution limits -- and coal power saves millions in fuel costs.
>>
>>Yet even the nearly clear vapor from the refinery contains as much as
>>double the carbon emissions of a refinery using natural gas, climate
>>experts say. So if coal-fired ethanol catches on, is it still the
>>"clean, renewable fuel" the state's favorite son, Sen. Tom Harkin
>>likes to call it?
>>
>>Such questions arrive amid boom times for America's ethanol industry.
>>
>>With 97 ethanol refineries pumping out some 4 billion gallons of
>>ethanol, the industry expects to double over the next six years by
>>adding another 4.4 billion gallons of capacity per year. Tax breaks
>>as well as concerns about energy security, the environment, and
>>higher gasoline prices are all driving ethanol forward.
>>
>>The Goldfield refinery, and the other four coal-fired ethanol plants
>>under construction are called "dry mill" operations, because of the
>>process they use. The industry has in the past used coal in a few
>>much larger "wet mill" operations that produce ethanol and a raft of
>>other products. But dry mills are the wave of the future, industry
>>experts say. It's their shift to coal that's causing the concern.
>>
>>More plants slated for Midwest, West
>>
>>Scores of these new ethanol refineries are expected to be built
>>across the Midwest and West by the end of the decade, and many could
>>soon be burning coal in some form to turn corn into ethanol, industry
>>analysts say.
>>
>>"It's very likely that coal will be the fuel of choice for most of
>>these new ethanol plants," says Robert McIlvaine, president of a
>>Northfield, Ill., information services company that has compiled a
>>database of nearly 200 ethanol plants now under construction or in
>>planning and development.
>>
>>If all 190 plants on Mr. McIlvaine's list were built and used coal,
>>motorists would not reduce America's greenhouse gas emissions,
>>according to an in-depth analysis of the subject to date by
>>scientists at University of California at Berkeley, published in
>>Science magazine in January.
>>
>>Of course, many coal-fired ethanol plants on the drawing board will
>>not be built, Mr. McIlvaine says. Others in planning for years may
>>still choose natural gas as fuel to meet air pollution requirements
>>in some states.
>>
>>Other variations on ethanol-coal are emerging in Goodland, Kan., and
>>Underwood, N.D., where ethanol plants are being built next to
>>coal-burning power plants to use waste heat. Efficient, but still
>>coal.
>>
>>That could spell trouble for ethanol's renewable image.
>>
>>"If your goal is to reduce costs, then coal is a good idea," says
>>Robert Brown, director of Iowa State University's office of
>>biorenewables. "If the goal is a renewable fuel, coal is a bad idea.
>>When greenhouse-gas emissions go up, environmentalists take note.
>>Then you've got a problem."
>>
>>Ethanol industry officials say coal-power is just one possibility the
>>industry is pursuing.
>>
>>"I think some in the environmental community won't be all that warm
>>and fuzzy about [coal-fired ethanol]," says Bob Dinneen, president of
>>the Renewable Fuels Association, the national trade association for
>>the US fuel-ethanol industry. "It's fair to say there's a trend away
>>from natural gas, but coal is just one approach. Other technologies
>>are part of the mix, too."
>>
>>He cites, for instance, a new ethanol plant in Nebraska strategically
>>located by a feed lot, using methane from cattle waste to fire
>>ethanol boilers. Another new plant in Minnesota uses biomass
>>gasification, using plant material as its fuel.
>>
>>Coal for now, wood in the future
>>
>>Coal may end up being merely a transitional fuel in the run-up to
>>cellulosic ethanol, including switch grass and wood, says another RFA
>>spokesman. While ethanol production today primarily uses only the
>>corn kernel, cellulosic will use the whole plant.
>>
>>Cellulosic ethanol, mentioned by President Bush in his State of the
>>Union speech, could turn the tide on coal, too, by burning plant
>>dregs in the boiler with no need for coal at all.
>>
>>"It's a fact that ethanol is a renewable fuel today and it will stay
>>that way," says Matt Hartwig, an RFA spokesman. "Any greenhouse-gas
>>emissions that come out the tailpipe are recycled by the corn plant.
>>I don't expect the limited number of coal-fired plants out there to
>>change that."
>>
>>Still, Hawkins insists that if ethanol is made using coal, the carbon
>>dioxide should be captured and injected into the ground.
>>
>>"We favor getting ethanol production up," Hawkins says. "But we
>>obviously favor a cleaner process. We need large cuts in global
>>warming emissions from transportation. It's not good enough for
>>ethanol to simply be no worse than gasoline."
>>
>>Mark Clayton is a staff writer for the Christian Science Monitor.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Biofuel mailing list
>>Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>>http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
>>
>>Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>>
>>Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
>>messages):
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Biofuel mailing list
> Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
> http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
> Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
> messages):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
> 


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to