Yes, what hypocrits.
I saw another interview with Gore where he mentioned that "killer co2 
sequestering ap" but 
he went on to infer if we get it right,(it would be)

regards
tallex



DK>  
>  The Bushies argue that there isn't a global warming problem, and that
>  America is doing more to address it than any other country.
>  
>  Sequestration is a no-brainer. There is no certainty that the CO2
>  would remain under water or wherever else it was put. Pumping CO2 into
>  the deep ocean or underground caverns or whatever would require a
>  considerable energy input, which means more fossil fuels would need to be
>  burned per unit of electricity provided, which means electricity would
>  become much more expensive. Some might argue that this wouldn't
>  necessarily be a bad thing, but it would also accelerate fossil fuel
>  depletion.
>  
>  
>  
>  I have a lot of respect for Al Gore but I saw a video of a talk he
>  gave, in which he described sequestration as "the killer app", which
>  was a great disappointment. There are much better ways to reduce
>  emisssions.
>  
>  
>  Regards
>  David





>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: David Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] New Coal Plants Bury 'Kyoto'
>  Sent: 16 Jan '07 13:58
>  
>  Keith Addison wrote:
>  
>  KA> President Bush says the U.S. will pursue its own policy of voluntary
>  KA> carbon reductions and conduct research into technologies like "carbon
>  KA> sequestration" -- burying CO2 rather than emitting it.
>  
>  
>  The Bushies argue that there isn't a global warming problem, and that
>  America is doing more to address it than any other country.
>  
>  Sequestration is a no-brainer. There is no certainty that the CO2
>  would remain under water or wherever else it was put. Pumping CO2 into
>  the deep ocean or underground caverns or whatever would require a
>  considerable energy input, which means more fossil fuels would need to be
>  burned per unit of electricity provided, which means electricity would
>  become much more expensive. Some might argue that this wouldn't
>  necessarily be a bad thing, but it would also accelerate fossil fuel
>  depletion.
>  
>  
>  
>  I have a lot of respect for Al Gore but I saw a video of a talk he
>  gave, in which he described sequestration as "the killer app", which
>  was a great disappointment. There are much better ways to reduce
>  emisssions.
>  
>  
>  Regards
>  David
>  
>  


Get your daily alternative energy news

Alternate Energy Resource Network
1000+ news sources-resources
             updated daily

http://www.alternate-energy.net



Next_Generation_Grid

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid/


Alternative_Energy_Politics

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics


Tomorrow-energy

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy


Earth_Rescue_International

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Earth_Rescue_International>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  KA>  To do that,
>  KA> the U.S. Department of Energy hopes to develop new technologies by
>  KA> 2012 that would economically capture the greenhouse gas before it
>  KA> leaves the power plant.
>  
>  KA> One approach -- called Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC)
>  KA> technology -- aims to siphon off CO2 before it's sent up the stack.
>  KA> The largest U.S. power company, American Electric Power in Columbus,
>  KA> Ohio, plans to build at least one commercial IGCC plant by 2010.
>  KA> Another coal-burning power company, Cinergy, in Cincinnati, this
>  KA> month said it also would build an IGCC plant.
>  
>  KA> But funding for a key billion-dollar federal IGCC experimental
>  KA> program called FutureGen is lagging. And unless the U.S. sets a limit
>  KA> on CO2 emissions that creates a market for carbon-reducing
>  KA> technology, there is little financial incentive to invest in such
>  KA> technology, experts say. As a result, the technology appears unlikely
>  KA> to be deployed in time to make much difference in the coming surge of
>  KA> power-plant construction.
>  
>  KA> Without such technology, the impact on climate by the new coal plants
>  KA> would be significant, though not entirely unanticipated. They would
>  KA> boost CO2 emissions from fossil fuels by about 14 percent by 2012,
>  KA> Schmidt estimates. That's within the 1 to 2 percent annual range for
>  KA> CO2 growth expected in "high-growth" scenarios put forward by climate
>  KA> scientists. But it does not fall into the "maximum" scenario they use
>  KA> to evaluate the worst-case impact of greenhouse gases.
>  
>  KA> The power of six
>  
>  KA> "The point is that a relatively small number of countries holds the
>  KA> fate of the planet in their hands in terms of climate change," says
>  KA> David Hawkins, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's
>  KA> climate center. "If the five or six countries building all these
>  KA> power plants were to come together to develop a strategy for carbon
>  KA> capture applied to coal, it would be a huge step toward cutting
>  KA> global warming."
>  
>  KA> Energy security is one factor driving the shift. With its 250-year
>  KA> supply of coal, the U.S. is often called the "Saudi Arabia of coal."
>  KA> China, with similarly huge reserves, is even planning to convert coal
>  KA> into synthetic fuel for cars -- even though such processes typically
>  KA> produce large amounts of greenhouse gases.
>  
>  KA> Coal's low price has been a powerful incentive, too. Chinese
>  KA> authorities are pushing for cleaner power. But gas pipelines in China
>  KA> aren't fully utilized because of that fuel's higher cost, experts
>  KA> say. And in the U.S., utility companies are shifting focus from
>  KA> natural gas to coal instead.
>  
>  KA> "There has been an abrupt about-face," says Robert McIlvaine, who
>  KA> heads his own Northfield, Ill., information company that tracks the
>  KA> construction of coal power plants globally. "Utilities that would not
>  KA> consider a coal-fired plant a year or two ago are now moving forward
>  KA> with coal-fired projects."
>  
>  KA> With natural gas prices expected to continue rising, 58 other nations
>  KA> have 340 new coal-fired plants in various stages of development. They
>  KA> are expected to go online in a decade or so. Malaysia, Japan,
>  KA> Indonesia, Thailand, and Turkey are all planning significant new
>  KA> coal- fired power additions. Germany also plans to build eight coal
>  KA> plants with 6,000 megawatts capacity.
>  
>  KA> But China is the key. "The Chinese will surpass the coal-fired
>  KA> generating capacity and the CO2 emissions of the U.S. in the next
>  KA> couple of years," Mr. McIlvaine says.
>  
>  KA> Hit by blackouts and power restrictions for 18 months, China has been
>  KA> scrambling to relieve that pressure. Scores of unauthorized power
>  KA> projects about which little is known have sprouted nationwide --
>  KA> along with hundreds of official projects, McIlvaine says. Because of
>  KA> this, even careful estimates could be low, both he and Bergesen say.
>  
>  KA> "Environmental optimists were assuming the world was going to switch
>  KA> to gas, but when you're short of gas you use your own coal," says
>  KA> Philip Andrews-Speed, a China energy expert at the University of
>  KA> Dundee, in Scotland. "What you're seeing with China and the others is
>  KA> the cheapness and security of coal just overwhelming the desire to be
>  KA> clean."
>  
>  KA> Copyright 2007 The Christian Science Monitor
>  
>  KA> _______________________________________________
>  KA> Biofuel mailing list
>  KA> Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>  KA> http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
>  
>  KA> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>  KA> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>  
>  KA> Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
> messages):
>  KA> http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
>  
>  
>  
>  _______________________________________________


Get your daily alternative energy news

Alternate Energy Resource Network
1000+ news sources-resources
      updated daily

http://www.alternate-energy.net



Next_Generation_Grid

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid/


Alternative_Energy_Politics

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics


Tomorrow-energy

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy


Earth_Rescue_International

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Earth_Rescue_International



_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to