Keith,

I wasn't trying to get her contributions banned, merely to get her to be a bit 
more selective. But, yes, I guess I can just delete. I have actually found some 
of her stuff quite interesting.

It was an allergic reaction, and I guess it was out of order. So ignore my 
little rant...

David

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Sustainablelorgbiofuel Digest, Vol 23, Issue 12
> To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:10:09 +0200
> 
> Send Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list submissions to
>       sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Sustainablelorgbiofuel digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Lilly Sold Drug for Dementia Knowing It Didn?t Help
>       ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>    2. Re: FAO SurpriseShan2 (Keith Addison)
>    3. Re: FAO SurpriseShan2 (Adrian Higgs)
> 
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:34:11 +0900
> From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] FAO SurpriseShan2
> To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
> 
> Thankyou Michelle, indeed so, well put.
> 
> >David,
> >
> >I have subscribed for some time now without much, if any 
> >contribution.  There is a variety of topics posted here for 
> >discussion.  Many of which I delete without reading, but I am 
> >thankful these people are allowed to post and share their knowledge 
> >and/or concern for things they think we should be aware of.  Many of 
> >these readers/contributors have a niche in a certain interest or 
> >topic that would take me lifetimes of reading, research, and 
> >understanding to acquire.  I am thankful they are allowed to post.
> >
> >On occasion I feel it necessary to speak up and defend the posts 
> >because I have learned so much from this website.  I am thankful for 
> >the broad and specific, on topic and off topic, and the ever 
> >enriching environment that is encouraged.
> >
> >Michele
> >
> >
> >>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>  To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
> >>  Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:25:24 +0200
> >>  Subject: [Biofuel] FAO SurpriseShan2
> >>
> >>
> >  > With all due respect, while I'm sure your posts are of interest 
> >to us all, I'm not sure of the relevance to the raison d'etre of 
> >this list.
> 
> It's a sustainability list really, and so it must deal with 
> non-sustainability too, and there are all these grey areas where the 
> various issues merge into each other. Energy affects just about 
> everything, lots of dots to join up, you can start just about 
> anywhere, it's all connected. Where one draws the relevance line 
> depends on your point of view, and with a worldwide membership not 
> many people would draw it in the same place. (That's part of its 
> strength.) Much better to leave it open than to try to restrict it.
> 
> There was a lot of fighting about this eight or nine years ago, and 
> that was the consensus in the end. It's in the list rules: "No calls 
> for restricted discussion. It's a discussion list, not a 
> less-discussion list." No topic-cops. 
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg70818.html> 
> [Biofuel] List rules
> 
> With open discussion nobody's deprived of anything, but trying to 
> keep the discussions strictly on-topic would deprive those who don't 
> see it that way. Also, the highly useful list archives would have 
> much less depth than it's accumulated through open discussion.
> 
> Anyway, nobody's forced to read anything, messages have subject 
> titles, if you're not interested don't read them.
> 
> >  > Personally, it's like a flashback to all my mother's emails from 
> >Dr Briffa. At least I could tell her to stop.
> 
> :-) Or just not read them. See 
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg21651.html>.
> 
> All best
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> >  > No offence meant,
> >>
> >  > David
> 
> 
> 
> 


_________________________________________________________________
More than messages–check out the rest of the Windows Live™.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20090618/6bdef19a/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to