The Minutes to the June 17th meeting of the Tompkins Legislature have finally 
been approved and posted, over a month later. A link to the entire Minutes is 
below and below that the Carbon Tax Resolution as passed and the accompanying 
discussion. 

 

Sylvester Johnson, Margaret McCasland and I spoke at this meeting during 
“Privilege of the Floor”.

The original resolution by the Environmental Management Council had a provision 
stating that if a carbon tax were not enacted, cap and auction would be the 
next best choice. However as noted below, the Legislature voted to remove that 
Resolve in favor of a stronger, clearer statement in support of the federal 
carbon tax.   Sylvester’s unfailing persistence (with the support if the 
Climate Change Action Group) succeeded. 

 

The final vote in favor of the carbon Tax Resolution was 10- 4 falling exactly 
along party lines.  


BTW while the action of passing a federal carbon tax resolution may seem 
"cheap" it is a clear statement of support for what should be also be national 
policy.   Local measures are of course vitally important and can certainly lead 
by examples. But it's tough for a locality to stand alone so acting on both 
levels is necessary.  

I actually think passing a local resolution for a federal tax is still a 
comparatively daring thing to do. And I can tell you there is nothing cheap in 
any sense of the word about the effort to launch a federal carbon tax
 initiative...Sylvester has invested a great deal of time and gone to 
considerable expense for 5 ads in nationwide publications. And other members of 
CCAG, especially Margaret and I, have also put in alot of work.



Jeanne

 

 

http://www.tompkins-co.org/legislature/minutes/6-17-08.pdf

 

Individual Member-Filed Resolution(s) 

RESOLUTION NO. 126 – EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR FEDERAL ACTION TO REDUCE CARBON 
EMISSIONS THROUGH THE MECHANISM OF A CARBON TAX 

MOVED by Ms. Chock, seconded by Mrs. McBean-Clairborne. Ms. Chock thanked the 
Environmental Management Council for their work on the resolution. She spoke of 
the need for Federal action on carbon emissions and that the City of Ithaca and 
Town of Ithaca both weighed in on the conversations. The resolution is the 
result of four months of presentations by scientists, environmentalists, and 
concerned citizens. Ms. Chock noted it is a complex issue and the resolution 
speaks to how to achieve reductions. While many agree that carbon emissions 
must be reduced, there is disagreement about how best to achieve that. This 
resolution stresses the need to reduce and offers a compromise position on the 
recommendation to federal and other officials about how to proceed. Ms. Chock 
thanked Ms. Kiefer for her work in preparing the resolution and urged members 
to support it. 

Mr. Stevenson appreciated the work but is not supportive of the resolution. 
Although it is a complicated issue he cannot support more taxes. Ms. Herrera 
agreed it is a complex issue=2
0and is grateful for those who explained the concern of carbon emissions and 
therefore it is a tax she could support, although not the portion referring to 
trade and auction. 

 

It was MOVED by Ms. Herrera, seconded by Ms. Robertson, to remove the following 
Resolved from the resolution: 

 

“RESOLVED, further, That if a carbon tax fails to pass at the Federal Level, 
the Tompkins County Legislature declares its support for a cap-and-auction 
system as a next-best alternative, with the following caveats: 

 

• polluters should pay for the right to pollute, using auctions not allotments, 
and should not be given permits at zero cost, 

 

• the cap-and-auction should be implemented as far upstream as possible, with 
auction via a single open market that is national not global, and with public 
monitoring to ascertain the validity of the system, 

 

• the system should be strictly national; offsets would not be allowed; a 
significant penalty should be imposed for fossil-fuel use without allowances, 

 

• a “hard cap” should be set for all large users of fossils fuels together, 
reduced every year, and reach eighty percent reduction in greenhouse gas 
emissions (as CO2 equivalents) by 2050.” 

 

A voice vote on the amendment resulted as follows: Ayes – 10 (Legislators 
Burbank, Dennis, Herrera, Koplinka-Loehr, Mackesey, McBean-Clairborne, 
Robertson, Shinagawa Sigler, and Stevenson); Noes – 4 (Legislators Chock, Kief
er, Hattery, and Proto); Excused – 1 (Legislator Randall). AMENDMENT APPROVED. 

 

Ms. Robertson will support the resolution, noting it is now a stronger document 
and she believes if the government had taken action when this problem was first 
discovered we would be better off. Mr. Hattery agrees with Mr. Stevenson 
regarding citizens’ need to limit taxation. Mr. Burbank expressed his belief 
that at a local level the resolution expresses community concern and should 
percolate to the level required. He hopes the community will continue 
discussions to exhibit strong support for the reduction of carbon emissions. 
Mr. Sigler does not support the resolution and feels it does not sequester the 
problem, rather it punishes those creating it. In addition, he does not feel 
another tax is appropriate, that the present fuel tax should be utilized to 
address the problem. Mr. Dennis will support the resolution, noting it 
expresses a concern to the appropriate government officials. 

 

A voice vote on the resolution resulted as follows: Ayes – 10 (Legislators 
Burbank, Chock, Dennis, Herrera, Kiefer, Koplinka-Loehr, Mackesey, 
McBean-Clairborne, Robertson, and Shinagawa); Noes – 4 (Legislators Hattery, 
Proto, Sigler, and Stevenson); Excused – 1 (Legislator Randall). RESOLUTION 
ADOPTED. 

 

WHEREAS, global warming, characterized by extremes of climate change, has been 
identified by an overwhelming consensus of scientists as caused primarily by 
carbon dioxide emissions from manmade sources and by widespread def
orestation, and 

WHEREAS, global warming threatens economies and ecosystems throughout the 
world, and 

WHEREAS, legislation at the Federal level is being considered for reductions in 
heat-trapping emissions of greenhouse gas emissions including carbon dioxide, 
through either a Federal carbon tax or emissions trading, and 

WHEREAS, the outcome of this legislative debate will substantially affect 
residents of Tompkins County for decades, and 

WHEREAS, both tradable pollution permits and taxing environmental pollution are 
economic methods to reach environmental goals, with the main difference between 
them being that (1) with permits, government sets the amount of emissions that 
are allowed and lets the market set the price of the permits as they are 
auctioned off or traded; in contrast (2) with an environmental tax the price of 
the environmentally destructive pollution is set by the government as the tax 
rate, and the market determines the amount of pollution that will occur at that 
price, and 

WHEREAS, either auctioning pollution allowances or implementing a tax will 
raise Federal revenues that can be used to relieve the cost burden on 
low-income persons and to underwrite the development of alternative sustainable 
energy systems, and 

WHEREAS, offsets and trading across national borders make the system 
particularly hard to monitor and enforce, inviting noncompliance, and 

WHEREAS, both carbon taxes and cap-and-trade systems can be effective means of 
reducing emissions of CO2, so from the perspective of economic theory they are
 equivalent, but from the regulatory and administrative perspective a tax is 
more cost effective, and June 17, 2008 13 WHEREAS, the Tompkins County 
Environmental Management Council has examined these issues and passed 
Resolution No. 01-2008 “Resolution Recommending County Support for a Federal 
Carbon Tax”, now therefore be it 

RESOLVED, That for these environmental, economic, and administrative reasons, 
the Tompkins County Legislature declares its support for enactment of a Federal 
carbon tax on importers and domestic extractors and refiners of fossil fuels, 
to be levied upstream in order to minimize the number of entities being 
directly taxed and the expense of monitoring compliance, with revenues directed 
to tax relief for low- and moderate-income households and financial support for 
conservation and sustainable energy programs, with public monitoring to assure 
compliance, 

RESOLVED, further, That copies of the resolution shall be sent to the Tompkins 
County State and Federal representatives as well as the Chair and Members of 
the appropriate Senate and House Committees. 

 
_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/ 

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to