Gay, 
 
The vast majority of zoning regulations in New York, Ithaca and Tompkins County 
included, are premised on the notion that the surburban built environment, with 
its large lot single-family home development, economically and socially 
homogeneous neighborhoods, coupled with the separation of various land 
uses into isolated pockets accessible only by automobile, is a superior form of 
development.   In many of the communities I've worked in over the past two 
decades, zoning regulations pose a major obstacle to developing the kind of 
community where a person can be born, grow up, marry, raise a family, retire 
and die in close proximity to family and friends..  
 
This "whole life" community was the vision of the planners for Radburn, NJ in 
the 1920s and the federal New Deal city of Greenbelt MD of the late 1930s.  
Robert E. Simon, the developer of Reston, Virginia had the same vision in the 
1950s.  Despite the fact that the Radburn and Greenbelt were never fully built 
out and that Simon lost control of his company before Reston was completed, 
these communities came very close to achieving that goal through progressive 
planning that accommodated a wide variety of residential architecture with 
neighborhoods and design that provided for persons of all abilities to move 
about the community.
 
Changes to local zoning regulation in New York that are needed include:
 
1)  Perimitting a variety of residential architecture beyond the single-family 
home on a large lot that most residential zoning districts in the state are 
limited to, including those in cities and towns.  Rampant discrimination in 
zoning regulations against manufactured housing, townhome architecture and 
rental housing throughout the state pretty much ensures that the types of 
housing needed by our elderly, as well as the increasing number of  home health 
care workers and other needed to support the elderly in our communities, is 
impossible without heavy tax subsidies.
 
2)  Treating elder cottage (ECHO) housing as a legitimate accessory use and 
permitting such homes  in all residential districts.  Also the standard "55 or 
over" age restrictions normally applied in communities where elder cottages are 
allowed should be eliminated in order to permit a) adult children with 
disabilities to live close to their parents and remain within their community, 
as opposed to a group home, and b) adult children who may desire to move home 
to care for their elderly parents.
 
3)  Incoprorate provisions that would permit senior living complexes such as 
Ithacare and Kendall in the community.  Despite the need very few 
municipalities list such facilities as permitted uses in their zoning 
regulations.  Instead the developers of such community assets must jump through 
numerous hoops and get special local legislation passed in order for these 
vital facilities to be built.
 
4)  Increase permitted zoning densities overall in order to encourage the 
development of walkable, bikable communities and to promote the types of 
population densities necessary to provide the critical mass of population 
needed to make the neighborhood scale commercial retail and other services that 
the elderly need close to home economically feasible.  Denser, more compact 
communities could also eliminate many of the costs associated with sprawl and 
address the issue raised by Tom Shelly and others regarding burdensome taxes. 
 
Bet regards.
 
George Frantz



      
_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/ 

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to