Link to photo version of article in Grist and Link to Food/Climate Manifesto.  
Simple text article also pasted below 
Jeanne

 

 

 

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/10/25/904/94558

 

http://www.arsia.toscana.it/petizione/documents/clima/CLIMA_ING.pdf

 

 

Terra Madre notes: Vandana Shiva rocks the house

 

A food/climate manifesto presents new visions for responding to climate change

Posted by Tom Philpott at 10:43 PM on 26 Oct 2008

 

Turin, Italy -- I've just come out of the most hopeful and interesting 
discussions of climate change I've ever witnessed. Anchored by Indian 
food-sovereignty activist Vandana Shiva, the panel discussion at Terra Madre 
unveiled a new "Manifesto on Climate Change and the Future of Food Security," 
drawn up by the International Commission on the Future of Food and Agriculture.

 

The room was packed beyond capacity with at least 400 people, and the 
discussion was translated through headsets into eight languages.

 

The document under discussion -- which can be found here -- is brisk, lucid, 
and to the point. I will be publishing it soon on Gristmill as one of those 
infamous multi-post series. 

 

 

.To me, Shiva and her multinational crew of colleagues (other commission 
members include Wendell Berry, Jose Bové of Via Campesina, Frances Moore Lappé, 
and Alice Waters) have articulated a powerful new vision for confronting 
climate change -- one more potent even than Al Gore's famed slides and push for 
trade-based solutions.

 

Where Gore dreams of a "low-carbon" or even "carbon-free" world, Shiva pines 
for a "carbon-rich" future -- one in which agriculture systematically builds 
organic matter into the soil, capturing it from the atmosphere. 

 

Shiva -- a forceful and erudite off-the-cuff speaker -- opened by running 
through the manifesto's main points: 

 

 

Industrial globalized agriculture contributes to and is vulnerable to climate 
change 

Ecological and organic farming contributes to mitigation and adaptation to 
climate change 

 

Transition to local, sustainable food systems benefits the environment and 
public health 

Biodiversity reduces vulnerability and increases resilience 

 

Genetically modified seeds and breeds: a false solution and dangerous diversion 

 

Industrial agrofuels: a false solution and new threat to food security 

 

Water conservation is central to sustainable agriculture 

 

Knowledge transition for climate adaptation 

 

Economic transition toward a sustainable and equitable food future 

 

After going down the list, Shiva gave a brief history of the global 
sustainable-food movement's involvement with the climate-change debate. She 
said that in the '90s, when discussions were going on around the Kyoto Treaty, 
there were simultaneous talks going on around a Biodiversity Treaty. 
Unfortunately, sustainable food activists, including herself, were content to 
let climate talks go on without their input; they focused instead on the 
biodiversity talks. As a result, she said, discourse around climate has almost 
completely ignored agriculture -- even though industrial agriculture emits 
something like a third of greenhouse gases. 

 

 

Shiva didn't say this, but I'll add it: Only by blithely ignoring agriculture's 
role in climate change can people present abominable ideas like 
government-mandated ethanol and biodiesel as "solutions" to the climate crisis. 

 

Shiva made what I found to be a novel and powerful point about livestock's 
contribution to greenhouse gases, recently documented by the U.N.'s Food and 
Agriculture Organization: If you're going to take animals off of pastures, 
deprive them of their native foods (i.e., grass for cows, bugs for chickens, 
whatever the landscape offers for pigs), and feed them a diet heavy on beans 
(i.e., soy), they're going to get gas -- literally, greenhouse gas (methane). 

 

She said more great stuff than I could copy down. She said that in the current 
economic system, we release 400 years worth of naturally stored carbon every 
year. Even if we stop tomorrow, we're still going to get extreme droughts, 
cyclones that wash saltwater into soils, floods that wash away soil nutrients, 
etc. In that context, locally adapted agriculture is the "only adaption 
strategy that gives us any hope." 

 

She said climate treaties and discussions take place in the stratosphere -- in 
congressional committees, exclusive global confabs peopled by CEOs of vast 
business empires, etc. She said these people operate under an industrial 
paradigm, and the solutions they concoct to climate change -- cap-and-trade 
mechanisms, GMO seeds, etc. -- mimic and don't challenge that paradigm. While 
she was talking, I thought of the extraordinary set of charts from New 
Scientist that David Roberts posted last week -- the ones showing the titanic 
rise of resource consumption and industrial activity in the last century. 

 

I realized why certain right-wingers so vigorously deny human-provoked climate 
change, and why technocrats push "market-based solutions" to it: because 
climate change amounts to a tremendous rebuke, from the very earth we stand on 
and the air we breathe, to industrial-scale economies. The initial answers are 
denial or desperate attempts to rejigger industrial economies, to make them 
"carbon-free." 

 

But in the end, these attempts get nowhere. Real reform, Shiva insisted, will 
happen when discussions move from the stratosphere to the soil, and when we 
find new, non-industrial ways of thinking.

 

Shiva responded well to questions from the audience. A Londoner who runs two 
"sustainable" restaurants said that his clients ask him all the time if the 
world isn't doomed, because China and India are rapidly developing into 
Western-style economies, and using huge amounts of resources along the way. 
Given that reality, why should Westerners even try to be "sustainable"? He said 
he needed help with how to answer these questions -- all he does now is stammer 
something about how "maybe we can show them [Indians and Chinese] a more 
sustainable way ..." 

 

Before turning the floor over to Shiva, the moderator pointed out that the 
average American uses the resources of something like 10 to 15 average Indians. 
Then Shiva made some excellent points about how the explosion of the Indian and 
Chinese economies pays tribute to the consumptive power of Americans and 
Europeans -- we've gutted our own industrial bases and moved them east, in 
search of cheap labor and lax environmental controls.

 

She said that something like 5 percent of Indians have benefited from this 
trend, and added that per capita food consumption for most Indians had actually 
declined in the past 20 years. Food security, meanwhile, has been threatened. 
She pointed out that peasant farmers in India's most fertile area are fighting 
to save their land from being swallowed up by a car factory. She might have 
added that China's most productive farmland is under severe pressure from 
industrial pollution and expansion.

 

Another Englishman, from The Independent, pointed out that the last time "our 
preferred ways of agriculture" held sway, global population could be counted in 
the hundreds of millions. Today we are 6.7 billion -- and growing. What do you 
say to folks who insist that a return to community-scale, low-input ag will 
cause millions to starve?

 

The question was asked with the air of "all very nice indeed, but serious 
people concern themselves with feeding the world, and you people are being 
nostalgic." Shiva responded like Babe Ruth taking aim at a slowly gliding 
softball. 

 

First, she pointed out that for all of industrial ag's vaunted food-production 
power, 1 billion people -- and growing -- live with hunger. Then she forcefully 
made the point that mixed-crop agriculture that relies on compost is actually 
many times more productive on a per-acre basis than industrial monoculture. She 
also noted that locally adapted agriculture is not a fixed, static thing -- it 
evolves and responds to changes in the land and climate. So which style of 
agriculture is it that threatens millions with starvation? Case closed.

 

 
_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/ 

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to