Joel is correct (as he so often is); I was conflating two separate  
issues: water conservation (which matters more now that climate  
changes here and everywhere have reduced groundwater recharge) and  
nutrient conservation.

However there are linkages. The current system aggravates both  
problems: it wastes lots of water while "disposing" of "waste" in ways  
that turn valuable nutrients into nuisance nutrients by putting them  
in the wrong place. Conversely, some of the alternatives discussed n  
this thread conserve both water and nutrients.

Funny how many "win/win" solutions there are when you start thinking  
in terms of whole ecosystems . . . .

Margaret


On Mar 5, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Joel and Sarah Gagnon wrote:

> Thanks to Tom for the article on peak phosphorus. The take-home  
> message
> there was that we need to recycle phosphorus in order to conserve our
> declining geologic sources. That means beneficial reuse of human and  
> animal
> "wastes". For more on ecosanitation and urine diversion, see the  
> following:
>
> http://www.howtopedia.org/en/Category:Sanitation
>
> Joel
>
> At 05:55 PM 3/3/09 -0800, you wrote:
>
>> Crow and I just got back from a Rainbow Gathering where everyone is  
>> taught
>> not to "go" near the water because we drink it.  On the other end,  
>> I come
>> back to my office where the auto-flush function causes the toilet  
>> to start
>> flushing as soon as I walk in and not stop until after I leave the
>> restroom entirely.
>>
>> For a good book on the subject, check out the "Humanure Handbook" by
>> Joseph Jenkins.  It is available free online and we have a copy I  
>> am happy
>> to share.
>>
>>
>> --- On Sun, 3/1/09, Joel and Sarah Gagnon
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Joel and Sarah Gagnon <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [SustainableTompkins] Fw: Yellow Is the New Green
>>> To: "Sustainable Tompkins County listserv"
>> <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Sunday, March 1, 2009, 7:10 PM
>>> Indeed, it does. This is an apt form of source separation.
>>>
>>> Joel
>>>
>>> At 12:56 PM 3/1/09 -0500, you wrote:
>>>> This article makes a nice sidebar to Tom Shelley's
>>> TCLocal piece on
>>>> waste treatment last month.
>>>>
>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>> ==================================================================
>>>>
>>>> The New York Times
>>>> Op-Ed Contributor
>>>> Yellow Is the New Green
>>>> By ROSE GEORGE
>>>>
>>>> Woolley, England
>>>>
>>>> IN the far reaches of Shaanxi Province in northern
>>> China, in an
>>>> apple-producing village named Ganquanfang, I recently
>>> visited a
>>>> house belonging to two cheery primary-school teachers,
>>> Zhang Min
>>>> Shu and his wife, Wu Zhaoxian. Their house wasn't
>>> exceptional -- a
>>>> spacious yard, several rooms -- except for the
>>> bathroom. There, up
>>>> a few steps on a tiled platform, sat a toilet unlike
>>> any I'd
>>>> seen. Its pan was divided in two: solid waste went in
>>> the back,
>>>> and the front compartment collected urine. The liquids
>>> and solids
>>>> can, after a decent period of storage and composting,
>>> be applied
>>>> to the fields as pathogen-free, expense-free
>>> fertilizer.
>>>>
>>>> From being unsure of wanting a toilet near the house
>>> in the first
>>>> place -- which is why the bathroom is at the far end of
>>> their
>>>> courtyard -- the couple had become so delighted with it
>>> that they
>>>> regretted not putting it next to the kitchen after all.
>>>>
>>>> What does this have to do with you? Mr. Zhang and Ms.
>>> Wu's weird
>>>> toilet -- known as a "urine diversion," or
>>> NoMix (after a Swedish
>>>> brand), toilet -- may have things to teach us all.
>>>>
>>>> In the industrialized world, most of us (except those
>>> who have
>>>> septic tanks) rely on wastewater-treatment plants to
>>> remove our
>>>> excrement from the drinking-water supply, in great
>>>> volumes. (Toilets can use up to 30 percent of a
>>> household's water
>>>> supply.) This paradigm is rarely questioned, and I
>>> understand why:
>>>> flush toilets, sewers and wastewater-treatment plants
>>> do a fine
>>>> job of separating us from our potentially toxic waste,
>>> and
>>>> eliminating cholera and other waterborne diseases.
>>> Without them,
>>>> cities wouldn't work.
>>>>
>>>> But the paradigm is flawed. For a start, cleaning
>>> sewage guzzles
>>>> energy. Sewage treatment in Britain uses a quarter of
>>> the energy
>>>> generated by the country's largest coal-fired power
>>> station.
>>>>
>>>> Then there is the nutrient problem: Human excrement is
>>> rich in
>>>> nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, which is why it has
>>> been a
>>>> good fertilizer for millenniums and until surprisingly
>>>> recently. (A 19th-century "sewage farm" in
>>> Pasadena, Calif., was
>>>> renowned for its tasty walnuts.) But when sewage is
>>> dumped in the
>>>> seas in great quantity, these nutrients can unbalance
>>> and
>>>> sometimes suffocate life, contributing to dead zones
>>> (405
>>>> worldwide and counting, according to a recent study).
>>> Sewage,
>>>> according to the United Nations Environment Program, is
>>> the
>>>> biggest marine pollutant there is. Wastewater-treatment
>>> plants
>>>> work to extract the nutrients before discharging sewage
>>> into water
>>>> courses, but they can't remove them all.
>>>>
>>>> And there's also the urine problem. Urine, like any
>>> liquid, is a
>>>> headache for wastewater managers, because most sewer
>>> systems take
>>>> water from street drains along with the toilet, shower
>>> and kitchen
>>>> kind. Population growth is already taxing sewers.
>>> (London's great
>>>> network was built in the late 19th century with 25
>>> percent extra
>>>> capacity, but a system designed for three million
>>> people must now
>>>> serve more than twice as many.) When a rainstorm
>>> suddenly sends
>>>> millions of gallons of water into an already overloaded
>>> system,
>>>> the extra must be stored or -- if storage is lacking --
>>>> discharged, untreated, into the nearest river or
>>> harbor. Each
>>>> week, New York City sends about 800 Olympic-size
>>> swimming pools'
>>>> worth of sewage-polluted water into nearby waters
>>> because there's
>>>> nowhere else for it to go.
>>>>
>>>> This probably won't kill us, but it's not
>>> ideal. Environmental
>>>> scientists in California have calculated that sewage
>>> discharged
>>>> near 28 Southern California beaches has contributed to
>>> up to 1.5
>>>> million excess gastrointestinal illnesses, costing as
>>> much as $51
>>>> million in health care. We can do better.
>>>>
>>>> Urine might be one way forward. Before engineers scoff
>>> into their
>>>> breakfast, consider that since at least 135,000
>>> urine-diversion
>>>> toilets are in use in Sweden and that a Swiss aquatic
>>> institute
>>>> did a six-year study of urine separation that found in
>>> its
>>>> favor. In Sweden, some of the collected urine -- which
>>> contains 80
>>>> percent of the nutrients in excrement -- is given to
>>> farmers, with
>>>> little objection. "If they can use urine and
>>> it's cheap, they'll
>>>> use it," said Petter Jenssen, a professor at the
>>> Agricultural
>>>> University of Norway.
>>>>
>>>> The price of phosphorus fertilizers rose 50 percent in
>>> the past
>>>> year in some parts of the world, as phosphate reserves,
>>> the
>>>> largest of which are in Morocco and China, dwindle.
>>> (The gloomiest
>>>> predictions suggest they'll be gone in 100 years.)
>>> Although half
>>>> of sewage sludge in the United States is already turned
>>> into cheap
>>>> fertilizer known as "biosolids," urine
>>> contains hardly any of the
>>>> pathogens or heavy metals that critics of biosolids
>>> claim remain
>>>> in mixed sewage, despite treatment.
>>>>
>>>> The rest of Sweden's collected urine goes to
>>> municipal wastewater
>>>> plants, but in much smaller volume so it's easier
>>> to deal
>>>> with. Research by Jac Wilsenach, now a civil engineer
>>> in South
>>>> Africa, found that removing even half of the
>>> nutrient-rich urine
>>>> enables the bacteria in the aeration tanks to munch all
>>> the
>>>> nitrogen and phosphate matter in solid waste in a
>>> single day
>>>> rather than the usual 30. Urine diversion also makes
>>> for richer
>>>> sludge and produces more methane, which can be turned
>>> into gas or
>>>> electricity, Mr. Wilsenach said. In short, separating
>>> urine turns
>>>> a guzzler of energy into a net producer.
>>>>
>>>> Putting urine to use is not new. A friend's
>>> grandmother remembers
>>>> the man coming round for the buckets 60 years ago in
>>> Yorkshire,
>>>> which were then sold to the tanning industry. The flush
>>> toilet
>>>> ended that, and no one -- my friend's nan included
>>> -- wants
>>>> outside privies again. "Any innovation in the
>>> toilet that
>>>> increases owner responsibility is probably seen as
>>> downwardly
>>>> mobile," said Carol Steinfeld, of New Bedford,
>>> Mass., who imports
>>>> NoMix toilets into the United States.
>>>>
>>>> Then there's the sitting problem: in most
>>> urine-diversion toilets,
>>>> a man must empty his bladder sitting down. This
>>> wouldn't be a
>>>> problem in some countries -- Germany recently
>>> introduced a
>>>> toilet-seat alarm that admonishes standers to sit --
>>> but it has
>>>> been in others. Professor Jenssen was flummoxed by one
>>> participant
>>>> at a training workshop in Cuba who said firmly,
>>> "If a man sits, he
>>>> is homosexual."
>>>>
>>>> For now, "ecological sanitation" -- or more
>>> sustainable sewage
>>>> disposal -- thrives mostly in fast-industrializing
>>> countries like
>>>> China and India, which have money to invest in
>>> alternatives but
>>>> few sewers. A subculture of composting toilets exists
>>> in the
>>>> United States, but only a few hundred urine-diversion
>>> toilets have
>>>> been imported, Ms. Steinfeld said.
>>>>
>>>> Necessity -- whether occasioned by fertilizer prices,
>>> carbon
>>>> footprints or crippling capital investments -- could
>>> bring
>>>> change. At a recent wastewater conference, I watched in
>>>> astonishment as dour engineers rushed to question a
>>> speaker who
>>>> had been talking about stabilization ponds, which clean
>>> sewage
>>>> using water, flow control, bacteria and light.
>>> Normally, such
>>>> things would be cast into the box of hippie-ish
>>> ecological
>>>> sanitation. But to managers struggling with energy
>>> quotas and
>>>> budget limitations, more sustainable, less
>>> energy-intensive
>>>> sanitation may be starting to make sense.
>>>>
>>>> As Mr. Zhang told me with a smile: "For me,
>>> whatever the toilet
>>>> is, I use it. For example, here we eat wheat. When we
>>> go to the
>>>> south of China, we eat rice. Otherwise we starve."
>>>>
>>>> It's been more than 100 years since Teddy Roosevelt
>>> wondered aloud
>>>> whether "civilized people ought to know how to
>>> dispose of the
>>>> sewage in some other way than putting it into the
>>> drinking water."
>>>> The Zhang family toilet is not the perfect answer to
>>> Roosevelt, as
>>>> it still uses some water, though 80 percent less than a
>>> regular
>>>> flush toilet uses. But at least it's the result of
>>> someone asking
>>>> the right questions.
>>>>
>>>> ==
>>>>
>>>> Rose George is the author of "The Big Necessity:
>>> The Unmentionable
>>>> World of Human Waste and Why It Matters."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> For more information about sustainability in the
>>> Tompkins County area,
>>>> please visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/
>>>>
>>>> RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information
>>> for:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
>>>> Questions about the list? ask
>>> [email protected]
>>>> free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins
>>> County area, please visit:
>>> http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/
>>>
>>> RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
>>> Questions about the list? ask
>>> [email protected]
>>> free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County  
>> area,
>> please visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/
>>
>> RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
>> Questions about the list? ask [email protected]
>> free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org
> _______________________________________________
> For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County  
> area, please visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/
>
> RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
> [email protected]
> http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
> Questions about the list? ask [email protected]
> free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/ 

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
Questions about the list? ask [email protected]
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to