Thanks Randy.
Batik is almost that I mean, but it is java-stuff and some times too slo-o-o-o-w. Lack of extensibility of SVG viewers (or standard) is a very sad circumstance. It is no use to convert DICOM or other custom medical stuff to common raster format or even in interactive SVG due to a number various reasons (e.g. 3D interactive images), however it would be fine to mix SVG with different data presentation ActiveX, rendering bihaviors or applets. Microsoft way is XAML with high extensibility. Thank you. Shaman. --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Randy George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Shaman, > > I think you would have to convert your > Dicom images to something > useable in svg such as jpg or png in > order to use medical imagery inside > svg. I experimented with this awhile > back converting DICOM to jpg film > strips which could then be moved through > a masked view to simulate DICOM > animation. If you need to extend a > viewer for medical imagery you should > probably consider Batik rather than ASV. > Medical people don't like lossy jpg very > much so svg frameworks for > medical applications would probably > require using png. Unfortunately the png > rendering is somewhat slower than jpg and can > slow down client side > interactions that depend on javascript > events in ASV. I don't know if the > same is true of Batik. > > Randy ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
