At 11:18 AM 2/10/5, Rick Bullotta wrote, in part: > Let's face it - all most of us really need is some relatively > simple vector graphics rendered in our browsers. All of the > exotic filters and transforms and some of the more esoterica > in SVG are in the "nice to have" category. I'd be deliriously > happy to have SVG Basic or even SVG Tiny supported natively > by all major browsers.
I know that we can achieve rendering of basic SVG instructions in nearly any browser today, without having to install anything new, as web search term "actionscript svg" demonstrates. I don't know how closely the set of SVG rendering instructions supported by the above routines matches the SVG-Tiny set... might be some differences, but I believe the ActionScript routines are oriented around the filter-less SVG subsets. So... how closely do these match what you need to do? Any glaring omissions or awkwardness? Any potential action items I could raise to my partners on the Player team here...? tx, jd John Dowdell, Macromedia Developer Support, San Francisco (Best to reply on-list, to avoid my mighty spam filters!) Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ Technical daily diary: http://www.macromedia.com/go/blog_jd ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
