Hi Holger, I am not David...at least not at the moment, I think.
My answer was more geared to applying the xbl definitions. I thought that was what David wanted to get at. So it is quite possible that my answer was besides the point. Sorry. Johanne --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Holger Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > inf_demo schrieb: > > > --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Holger Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > as far as i understand it , binding is done via a match of the > > element- > > > attribute with the local name of an element. so i think creating > > your > > > definition, and then do myXBLElement.appendChild(definition) should > > be > > > enough. > > > > This is what I have done. However, after building the shadow tree, it > > is appended to an svg or g element not an xbl element, which is > > supposed to remain independent of the rendered elements afaik. > > > > Johanne > > Hi Johanne > are you david, whom i answered ? or did you just have the same question ? > did i misunderstand ? it sounds like you try to implement XBL, i thought > you just wanted to create definitions via js! > i really dont understand what you mean with: "after building the shadow > tree, its appended..." > what i meant, was that when creating definitions via js, you just append > this definition to an xbl- element. you dont do anything with any shadow > content... > please clearify. > cheers > Holger ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
