Hi Lance,

svg-developers@yahoogroups.com wrote on 05/11/2006 02:03:58 PM:

> > you can combine like this
> >    <rect style="transform="translate(8,48)" .... X1 xxx>

> However, it also makes for a lot of redundant attributes, or deeply 
> nested groups. I don't like that, but I guess there is no way around 
> that at this time?

   I don't see any "extra" redundancy SVG's way:

   <g ....>
     <rect transform="translate(1,1)" ...>
     <rect transform="translate(2,2)" ...>
   </g>

   Your way:

   <g ....>
     <set transform="translate(1,1)"/>
     <rect ...>
     <set transform="translate(2,2)"/>
     <rect ...>
   </g>

   It looks to me like your way has this extra "wasted" 'set' element.

> to reset the attribute at the time of processing; and even make the 
> set implicit to g="current" so I don't have to refer to it as that is 
> the deepest context anyways. Otherwise, svg gets verbose and redundant.

   I beg to differ, I'll admit that trying to nest your g elements isn't
that nice, but just setting the transform on the rects is very concise
and avoids a lot of issues like just what is the userspace of the g
if you can change it in the middle of the children list...



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free.  See how.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/1U_rlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my 
membership"
---- 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to