On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Roman Divacky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > what about commiting this to note this change? > > > > + <para>A serious problem emulating /proc for Linux was fixed. Many > > > > Linux > > > > + ports are now working including the linux-flashplugin9 > > > > port.</para> > > > "A serious problem was fixed"? Really? And if none of that software > > > worked before this commit, how come they were already in ports? > > I do not think that mentioning of this should appear in release notes, > > but Roman is mostly right in stating the fact. > > Pretend you don't really know the details of the change, and reread > Roman's proposed relnotes entry. Do you think it gives a correct > impression of the nature and severity of the issue?
my intention was to advertise that flash9 works ok now. Which is a thing a lot of people care about. Feel free to submit your own wording. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
