On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Xin LI wrote:
Sean C. Farley wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:36:07 -0500 (CDT) "Sean C. Farley" <s...@freebsd.org>
wrote:
functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
license.
Really? > ambigous
Citrus is licensed under BSD License or variant (like
Perl or MIT). It can use with (L)GPL.
WWW: http://citrus.bsdclub.org/
OK. Technically, the website is not ambiguous. It is the license
that is ambiguous. :) At least, they claim it is:
The license is still ambiguous at this point, but it will be either
a BSD Style License or use perl's model. In addition, "the license
must allow for BSD/MIT/(L)GPL uses of the code". This allows the
possibility that it will be picked up by X or glib. However, it is
only a "possibility". To be honest, so far there is not schedule to
do port to glibc strictly. The X Consortium may be interested in
iconv for its X-TT or Unicode support.
A person offering code for this project must agree to it being
distributed with this license condition. In addition, copyright of
this project is added to the source code. Of course the original
copyright is left in place as well.
IANAL but the code already included in NetBSD says. for example:
*snip BSD license*
So my understanding is that, at least these code are released under a
2-clause BSD code and we are supposed to be able to use these code
under such license?
If that is the case, then that is great. I was only going by what the
website said about the source.
Sean
--
s...@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
