On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:07:02 +0400
Stanislav Sedov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Log:
> > GNU Pth has some fragile kludges that were broken by r189828.
> > I've discussed this with the Pth maintainer and no clear solution
> > has emerged on the ports side of things, so for now, hack around
> > the issue in signal.h.
> Can't we just put a patch in ports tree itself? What meant under 'no
> clean solution emerged'? I can prepare a patch, if needed.
I think so, too. I have a quick hack patch.
ports/devel/pth/files/patch-pth_p.h.in
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
--- pth_p.h.in.orig 2006-06-09 02:54:03.000000000 +0900
+++ pth_p.h.in 2009-04-08 15:05:12.911807009 +0900
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
-#include <signal.h>
+//#include <signal.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <errno.h>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
