Julian Elischer <jul...@freebsd.org> wrote: > As long as there is a REALLY EASY WAY to regenerate them and it's well > documented,
Building each directory (in meta mode) is all that is/should be needed. > EXACTLY the same output > each time unless there is a source change, (so svn doesn't see a > change if there is none) Yes the results are stable - in the absense of bugs in makefiles. I think I fixed all those in the projects/bmake branch, but it is easy to introduce new issues. Anytime a makefile changes its behavior based on the existance of something it risks churning the dependencies b/w clean/update build. This same tech has been used by 1000+ engineers daily for a number of years now, it has made it much harder for them to break the build. > then I guess having them checked in is ok. (though a bit "yucky"). > I'd like the ability to make a full make however that DOES regenerate > them if I feel I have the time. When we've added targets to build system packages etc, then that should be simple. I still need to catch up with what bapt has been doing on that front though. Thanks --sjg _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
