Hi Bruce, * Bruce Evans <b...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > I wouldn't use an implementation anything like FreeBSD's. printf()s > must be serialized, and once printf() is serialized there is no need > for buffering or cnputs().
Indeed. Just adding some synchronisation to printf() should also work and is in my opinion the best solution. printf() should only be called in exceptional cases, so taking the overhead of locking shouldn't really matter there. Unfortunately I am not planning on fixing this before the code freeze. PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE really isn't beautiful, but it should be good enough for now. To be continued. -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgp0IeN2NS7Xo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
