On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:28:51 +0100 Hans Petter Selasky <h...@selasky.org> wrote:
> On 10/29/15 15:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >> The LinuxKPI is not a binary compatibility module, and will at some > > H> point have API's diverging from Linux, to fit BSD API's better. > > > > This statement makes the name of LinuxKPI quite pointless, as well > > as the whole idea of the KPI unclear. > > Hi, > > To be more clear. Adding bind_irq_to_cpu() is more an exception than the > default. A the moment I think Linux doesn't have an equivalent of this > function, because of Linux's interrupt model. > My question is whether a "normal" FreeBSD user has any reason to enable LinuxKPI now or in the future. -- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
