Author: ian Date: Wed Jan 13 00:22:12 2016 New Revision: 293792 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293792
Log: Go back to using uintptr_t, because code that actually compiles is infinitely less buggy than code that is theoretically correct in some alternate universe. The uintfptr_t type is apparently a freebsd invention, and exists only when compiling the kernel. It's a little hard to say for sure, since it doesn't seem to be documented anywhere except in email advice to unsuspecting and overly-trusting souls, who then get to wear the pointy hat for blindly following advice without investigating or testing it first. Modified: head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c Modified: head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c ============================================================================== --- head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c Tue Jan 12 23:48:39 2016 (r293791) +++ head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c Wed Jan 13 00:22:12 2016 (r293792) @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ uboot_loadaddr(u_int type, void *data, u biggest_block = 0; biggest_size = 0; - subldr = rounddown2((uintfptr_t)_start, KERN_ALIGN); + subldr = rounddown2((uintptr_t)_start, KERN_ALIGN); eubldr = roundup2((uint64_t)uboot_heap_end, KERN_ALIGN); for (i = 0; i < si->mr_no; i++) { if (si->mr[i].flags != MR_ATTR_DRAM) _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"