Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 13 00:22:12 2016
New Revision: 293792
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293792

Log:
  Go back to using uintptr_t, because code that actually compiles is
  infinitely less buggy than code that is theoretically correct in some
  alternate universe.
  
  The uintfptr_t type is apparently a freebsd invention, and exists only when
  compiling the kernel.  It's a little hard to say for sure, since it doesn't
  seem to be documented anywhere except in email advice to unsuspecting and
  overly-trusting souls, who then get to wear the pointy hat for blindly
  following advice without investigating or testing it first.

Modified:
  head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c

Modified: head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c      Tue Jan 12 23:48:39 2016        
(r293791)
+++ head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c      Wed Jan 13 00:22:12 2016        
(r293792)
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ uboot_loadaddr(u_int type, void *data, u
 
                biggest_block = 0;
                biggest_size = 0;
-               subldr = rounddown2((uintfptr_t)_start, KERN_ALIGN);
+               subldr = rounddown2((uintptr_t)_start, KERN_ALIGN);
                eubldr = roundup2((uint64_t)uboot_heap_end, KERN_ALIGN);
                for (i = 0; i < si->mr_no; i++) {
                        if (si->mr[i].flags != MR_ATTR_DRAM)
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to