On 02/03/16 12:38, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Author: pfg
Date: Wed Feb 3 14:31:23 2016
New Revision: 295209
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/295209
Log:
Revert r294695:
ext2fs: passthrough any extra timestamps to the dinode struct.
While it passed the classic testing, the change appears to have
caused some regression and still requires some more precautions.
PR: 206820
What's the classic testing — xfstests or something more/less thorough?
My regular testing is fsx and then build a port (cad/spice) on it.
Other people have been running other tests like pho's testsuite so
we usually catch anything.
I was going to ask what the regression was, but then I noticed the PR number.
Yeah, the error is related to the inode size: I only tested the
default (256) which has no problems. Considering the upcoming release
I just want to get the get this reverted and I'll worry about a real
fix later.
Pedro.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
