On 27.08.2016 20:37, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 02:43:13PM +0000, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>> Author: ache
>> Date: Sat Aug 27 14:43:13 2016
>> New Revision: 304911
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/304911
>>
>> Log:
>>   The formal behavior of qsort is unstable with regard to objects that
>>   are equal. Unfortunately, RFC 3484 requires that otherwise equal objects
>>   remain in the order supplied by the DNS server. The present code attempts
>>   to deal with this by returning -1 for objects that are equal (i.e.,
>>   returns that the first parameter is less then the second parameter).
>>   Unfortunately, the qsort API does not state that the first parameter
>>   passed in is in any particular position in the list.
> 
> Why not switch to mergesort which is stable by design?

megresort() is 1) slower 2) requires additional memory allocated.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to