On October 7, 2016 at 5:13:10 PM, Julian Elischer (jul...@freebsd.org) wrote: On 7/10/2016 4:29 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On October 7, 2016 at 4:18:31 PM, Julian Elischer (jul...@freebsd.org) wrote: On 7/10/2016 4:12 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On October 7, 2016 at 3:18:10 PM, John Baldwin (j...@freebsd.org) wrote: On Friday, October 07, 2016 01:16:59 PM Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On October 7, 2016 at 11:02:44 AM, John Baldwin (j...@freebsd.org) wrote: > On Friday, October 07, 2016 03:42:21 PM Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > *snip* > > > Author: marcel > > Date: Fri Oct 7 15:42:20 2016 > > New Revision: 306811 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/306811 > > > > Added: > > head/sys/sys/disk/ > > head/sys/sys/disk/apm.h > > - copied, changed from r306810, head/sys/sys/apm.h > > head/sys/sys/disk/bsd.h > > - copied, changed from r306810, head/sys/sys/disklabel.h > > head/sys/sys/disk/gpt.h > > - copied, changed from r306810, head/sys/sys/gpt.h > > head/sys/sys/disk/mbr.h > > - copied, changed from r306810, head/sys/sys/diskmbr.h > > head/sys/sys/disk/pc98.h > > - copied, changed from r306810, head/sys/sys/diskpc98.h > > head/sys/sys/disk/vtoc.h > > - copied, changed from r306810, head/sys/sys/vtoc.h > > Replaced: > > head/sys/sys/apm.h (contents, props changed) > > head/sys/sys/disklabel.h (contents, props changed) > > head/sys/sys/diskmbr.h (contents, props changed) > > head/sys/sys/diskpc98.h (contents, props changed) > > head/sys/sys/gpt.h (contents, props changed) > > head/sys/sys/vtoc.h (contents, props changed) > > Somehow this destroyed the history on these files. They showed up as > deleted and then added instead of modified. If you 'svn log' on them > now you only get this commit and none of the previous history. I've > no idea if there's a way to recover this? Had you originally done an > 'svn mv' in your checkout and then copied the files back over or some > such? > I did a move from sys/X.h to sys/disk/X.h. The history moved to sys/disk/X.h. > New files were put where the old files used to be. > > Should I have done a svn copy?
I think a copy would have been best. There is content in the sys/foo.h files still that has valid history (not all the lines were moved). Even if you had moved it all, I think a copy would still be best. I would only use a move if you are completely removing the original file. I'm not sure if there's a non-unfun way to recover from this. You might be able to copy the files from the previous revision, reapply your changes and then commit that. Ok. I’ll work on recovering the history of the original files. Maybe the repo masters can undo/delete the commit easily and I’ll just recommit. Avoids polluting the history… I'll keep an eye out for my svn -> p4 mirror importer exploding in that area in the near future. this sort of thing makes it very ill, especially files going away and coming back. I just asked svnadm@ for advice. I’m sure they can suggest a way that doesn’t blow things up downstream consumers. I’m fine with the manual labor if that’s preferred... I run a svn-> P4 imoprter that is importign at 1:1.. so change 300000 in SVN is 300000 in p4. If we end up making extra or missing revisions, I'll lose that 1:1 feature ..e.g. if 350000 in svn maps to 350001 or 349999 in p4 that's a lot less useful to me.. I’ll keep that in mind. If svnadm@ has no strong opinions, I’ll manually fix it up using commits. Thanks for the info,
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
