Colin Percival <cperc...@tarsnap.com> writes: > I wasn't talking about the value of RLIM_INFINITY, but rather about whether > rlim_t should be signed or unsigned. Right now it is signed; but POSIX says > it should be unsigned, and most other OSes follow POSIX's mandate here.
Yeah, I was a little bit confused about what my commit actually did (it's been 12 years!) but my point is that a) by all means, signedness doesn't really matter for compatibility, but b) if we're changing the type, we might as well change the value of RLIM_INFINITY to (rlim_t)-1 to match other OSes, and we can do it without significant breakage. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
