On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Ed Schouten <e...@nuxi.nl> wrote: > Hi Ed, > > 2016-07-19 19:46 GMT+02:00 Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org>: >> +.It arm Ta soft Ta soft, double precision > ... >> +.It mips Ta soft Ta identical to double > > I was wondering, what's the difference between two ways of phrasing > it? If long double is double precision, it's identical to double, > right? > >> +.It Dv BYTE_ORDER Ta Either Dv BIG_ENDIAN or Dv LITTLE_ENDIAN . >> +.Dv PDP11_ENDIAN is not used on FreeBSD. > > Would it make more sense to describe GCC/Clang's officially documented > endianness macros here? > > __BYTE_ORDER__ > __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ > __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ > __ORDER_PDP_ENDIAN__
I don't think so. We don't use them in the source tree (except to implement these macros). These are not standardized, so we use our macros as a standard. We want everybody to use them always, except in code we get from upstream. Warner _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
