On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:55:38AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20091207105343.ga62...@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>, Luigi Rizzo writes: > > >One way to promote this is to put the code in libc so even lazy > >people won't need to remember to pass linker flags when using the library. > > I don't think sbuf's belong in libc, unless we can persude POSIX to > adopt them.
right, then some other commonly used but not locked-by-standards place. libutil? libbsdstuffnotstandardizedbyposix ? Again my point (perhaps lost in the initial thread) was that the number of one-file libraries used in our base code is increasing: libsbuf, libjail, libbsdxml... to me, individual files are library members, there is no need to dedicate an entire library to a library member cheers luigi _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"