On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:55:38AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20091207105343.ga62...@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
> 
> >One way to promote this is to put the code in libc so even lazy
> >people won't need to remember to pass linker flags when using the library.
> 
> I don't think sbuf's belong in libc, unless we can persude POSIX to
> adopt them.

right, then some other commonly used but not locked-by-standards place.
libutil? libbsdstuffnotstandardizedbyposix ?

Again my point (perhaps lost in the initial thread) was that the number
of one-file libraries used in our base code is increasing:
        libsbuf, libjail, libbsdxml...
to me, individual files are library members, there is no need to
dedicate an entire library to a library member

cheers
luigi
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to