On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 01:39:21AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 07.06.2018 22:35, Brooks Davis wrote: > > >>>> You see, my point is that you can never know beforehand of all > >>>> challenges a sysadmin faces in fields. > >>>> And there should be really good reason to break things that work before. > >>>> Like, solving some significant issue we have with current setup. Do we > >>>> have such? > >>> > >>> This is not affected by my changes, you can install *additional* things > >>> in /etc/rc.d and they won't be touched just as today. > >> > >> Do we have any convention on naming such custom additional scripts > >> installed in /etc/rc.d > >> locally so that installworld would never overwrite them silently? > > > > script-domain.tld is almost certainly safe. > > That is, "script.local" should always be fine? That's fine.
In practice anything with a '.' is going to be safe because such scripts can't have name=<file-name> which is our internal convention. -- Brooks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
