Benjamin Kaduk <bjkf...@gmail.com> wrote: > With all due respect, NIST is hardly the sole authority on this topic.
True, unless of course you sell to US govt. > With my IETF Security Area Director hat on, any greenfield proposal coming > in > to the IESG that included sha1 support would get extremely strong pushback, > and I don't expect that "reducing boot time" would be seen as sufficiently > compelling. Well that's unfortunate, because reality (and sales teams) can be a pain. The number of customers who would trade boot time for improved security is depressingly small. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
