01.12.2018 4:29, Steven Hartland wrote: > On 30/11/2018 21:16, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> 30.11.2018 21:23, Warner Losh wrote: >> >>> So I'm back to my point: we should just put it into dd and move on with our >>> lives. It's really the right place for it. >> Why can't we have two implementations? Diversity is good thing. >> >> I can imagine erasing a partition with ZFS Cache or ZIL inside and >> "trim /dev/da0p2 /dev/da0p3" looks much better :-) > > ZFS already does that no need for a separate tool
Think of media taken out of (possibly already dead) ZFS-based to UFS-only system. By the way, how exactly do you trim previously ZIL partition withing working ZFS-based system? _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
