In message <cag6cvpx78rhmtwtm97we50qy_d2jx79upn-9tjmy90czeyv...@mail.gma il.com> , Conrad Meyer writes: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:22 PM Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> wrot > e: > > This is wrong. IIRC there was discussion that this should be in dd(1). > > Why not submit a revision to add the functionality to dd? > > Well, it's wrong, but not because we need another weird dd mode. dd > is hard enough to use already.
I've never found dd confusing. What's wrong conv=erase? If it must stay, sderase is a better name. That's really what it does. Ports maybe? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
