In message <20191118204836.GB43295@raichu>, Mark Johnston writes: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 08:35:30PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 01:09:19PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:48 PM Mark Johnston <ma...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:43:48PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:06 PM Mark Johnston <ma...@freebsd.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Author: markj > > > > > > Date: Mon Nov 18 19:05:52 2019 > > > > > > New Revision: 354824 > > > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354824 > > > > > > > > > > > > Log: > > > > > > Fix grammar in gpart.8. > > > > > > > > > > > > PR: 241973 > > > > > > MFC after: 3 days > > > > > > > > > > > > Modified: > > > > > > head/lib/geom/part/gpart.8 > > > > > > > > > > Don't forget to bump the .Dd date. > > > > > > > > AFAIK we do not bump .Dd for such changes, only for content changes. > > > > > > Isn't that a content change? I thought anything displayed to the user > > > counts as a content change? > > > > I presume that "content" means more like semantic, functional changes > > that affect some particular meaning. Grammar fixes are just, well, > > grammar fixes and thus do not warrant .Dd bump. > > Indeed, this was always my understanding as well. I can't find a > concrete definition anywhere. I don't understand why it would be useful > as a user to see the date of the last "content change" if such changes > might consist only of a small formatting change or typo fix. >
Should this be documented in the committers guide? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"