On 12 Jul 2020, at 11:51, Alexander Leidinger <netch...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Author: netchild > Date: Sun Jul 12 09:51:09 2020 > New Revision: 363125 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/363125 > > Log: > Implement CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW (linux >= 2.6.28). > > It is documented as a raw hardware-based clock not subject to NTP or > incremental adjustments. With this "not as precise as CLOCK_MONOTONIC" > description in mind, map it to our CLOCK_MONOTNIC_FAST (the same > mapping as for the linux CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE).
Okay, but: > @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ linux_to_native_clockid(clockid_t *n, clockid_t l) > *n = CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID; > break; > case LINUX_CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE: > + case LINUX_CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW: > *n = CLOCK_REALTIME_FAST; > break; > case LINUX_CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE: this shows it is actually mapped to CLOCK_REALTIME_FAST, not CLOCK_MONOTONIC_FAST. Is the code right, or the commit message? :) -Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
