On 04/01/10 13:43, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> B0;253;0cOn 2010.04.01 11:20:15 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 04/01/10 08:19, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
>>> Author: simon
>>> Date: Thu Apr 1 15:19:51 2010
>>> New Revision: 206046
>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/206046
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Merge OpenSSL 0.9.8n into head.
>>
>> Just curious, why not 1.0.0?
>
> The main reason is that 0.9.8n is needed for MFC to 7 and 8, so I
> prefered to get it tested a bit in -CURRENT first while I have the
> chance. I also prefered to get the security fixes for 0.9.8m into
> head faster - I don't know how much trouble 1.0.0 will be, but it will
> probably take some work.
Sounds reasonable, thanks for the explanation.
> That said, given how long OpenSSL 1.0 has been under way it would have
> been perfect to commit it today of all days :-).
Yes. :)
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
