On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:11:14AM +0000, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > - Some improvements on the exiting code, like replacing memcpy with > strlcpy/strcpy
Why is this an improvement? At least for non-trivial sizes, it is quite likely to be a regression. Especially using strlcpy as replacement for memcpy+\0 is bogus. Joerg _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"