On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:11:14AM +0000, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
>   - Some improvements on the exiting code, like replacing memcpy with
>     strlcpy/strcpy

Why is this an improvement? At least for non-trivial sizes, it is quite
likely to be a regression. Especially using strlcpy as replacement for
memcpy+\0 is bogus.

Joerg
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to