On 21 Aug 2010, at 19:20, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/21/2010 05:07, Rui Paulo wrote: >>> Meanwhile, the fact that in the past code has been committed >>> without man pages is the exact cause of the problem you're >>> describing. It is certainly not a justification for continuing to >>> do it wrong. >> >> Reverting code just because it doesn't have a man page is pointless. >> Everyone can write the damn man page, but not everyone can write >> code. You should really take this into consideration when proposing a >> commit to be reverted. > > So let's assume that having lots of code in the tree without a man page is a > problem. Further, let's assume that we don't want the problem to get worse. > How do you propose that we accomplish that?
By writing man pages...? Like I said, everyone can write a man page.. I did write man pages for stuff that hasn't had a man page for years (ctfmerge, ctfconvert, etc.). Regards, -- Rui Paulo _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
