On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:17:05PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Indeed, any subtraction is only in "u_char *p = (u_char *)PTOV(0);". If > you prefer, I will revert to the old expression, or maybe we could use > John's suggestion of: > > return (*(u_char *)PTOV(0x401) * 128 * 1024 + > *(uint16_t *)PTOV(0x594) * 1024 * 1024); > > which is less obfuscated. John suggestion looks best, and it makes code cleaner too.
pgplChNAmqf8N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
