On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: avg > Date: Tue Sep 21 15:07:44 2010 > New Revision: 212964 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/212964 > > Log: > kdb_backtrace: stack(9)-based code to print backtrace without any backend > > The idea is to add KDB and KDB_TRACE options to GENERIC kernels on > stable branches, so that at least the minimal information is produced > for non-specific panics like traps on page faults. > The GENERICs in stable branches seem to already include STACK option. > > Reviewed by: attilio > MFC after: 2 weeks > > Modified: > head/sys/kern/subr_kdb.c > > Modified: head/sys/kern/subr_kdb.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/kern/subr_kdb.c Tue Sep 21 12:57:43 2010 (r212963) > +++ head/sys/kern/subr_kdb.c Tue Sep 21 15:07:44 2010 (r212964) > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); > > #include "opt_kdb.h" > +#include "opt_stack.h" > > #include <sys/param.h> > #include <sys/systm.h> > @@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); > #include <sys/pcpu.h> > #include <sys/proc.h> > #include <sys/smp.h> > +#include <sys/stack.h> > #include <sys/sysctl.h> > > #include <machine/kdb.h> > @@ -300,6 +302,15 @@ kdb_backtrace(void) > printf("KDB: stack backtrace:\n"); > kdb_dbbe->dbbe_trace(); > } > +#ifdef STACK > + else { > + struct stack st; > + > + printf("KDB: stack backtrace:\n"); > + stack_save(&st); > + stack_print(&st);
I'd recommend using stack_print_ddb(), as that avoids any locking which may hang depending on how the kernel panic'd. Thanks, matthew > + } > +#endif > } > > /* > _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"