On May 5, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:

> On 05/05/11 16:18, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>> On May 5, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>> 
>>> @@ -84,15 +63,13 @@ if [ $bootable = yes ]; then
>>>     mv $MNT/boot/loader.efi $MNT/efi/boot/bootia64.efi
>>>     umount $MNT
>>>     mdconfig -d -u $md
>>> -    BOOTOPTS="-b $EFIPART -no-emul-boot"
>>> +    BOOTOPTS="-b bootimage=i386;$EFIPART -o no-emul-boot"
>>> else
>>>     BOOTOPTS=""
>>> fi
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Can you explain what this particular change does or why it's done?
>> 
> 
> I'm cleaning up the release-building code, and am switching them from mkisofs 
> to makefs, which provides the same functionality. This started with some 
> irritation with the cdrtools port and a bug in the HFS hybrid generation that 
> was breaking PPC release CD generation. Switching these to depend on makefs 
> in general speeds the release-building process and removes the number of 
> dependencies involved, since makefs is built as part of base.

Actually, I was just interested in the 'bootimage=i386' part
of your change. I totally get why you're doing it :-)

Sorry for not being clear...

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
mar...@xcllnt.net


_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to