on 12/05/2011 14:40 John Baldwin said the following: > > Hmmm, this might be interesting. I think you want to always wait for this > though > even if you have a teardown function. >
I think so too. In fact I have that change in my private tree, but was still waiting (a few months) for someone to enlighten why the code is the way it is. It seems that the problematic case is when both of the following are true: curcpu is not in the target cpu set and teardown function is not a "no rendevous" one [spelling mistake preserved :-)]. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
