On 22.05.2011 20:32, Warner Losh wrote: > After carefully reviewing this code, we need to have it be *OFF* by > default. It should also explain *WHY* it is rejecting the partition.
Did you reviewed r221992? > It isn't clear to me at all that this is even useful. While > different than Marcel's warnings, I think we need to take a very > cautious approach here. Where was this even talked about before the > fact? It seems like a fairly radical enforcement action to just > spring on people, especially now in light of it having so many false > positives. On the other hand now we know that many users have this problem, and we have time to properly fix it before release :) -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
