On 09/16/12 01:27, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:41:13 +0200
Grzegorz Bernacki<g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
On 09/14/12 16:16, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:33:35 +0000 (UTC)
Grzegorz Bernacki<g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Author: gber
Date: Fri Sep 14 09:33:35 2012
New Revision: 240484
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240484
Log:
Set busaddr and bussize to 0 when fdt_get_range() fails.
Why bussize is 0?
I though that setting it to 0 makes sense, since we do not use
this variable in this function and setting it to some value could be
confused. I could skip setting it, but I also thought it could cause
confusion :). If you think that setting it to other value or remove
it will be better please let me know and I will change it.
thanks
grzesiek
Yeah, indeed, false alarm. Sorry for noise.
But it will be very nice to hear developers opinion about ePAPR1.1 row
(about "range" property):
"If the property is not present in a bus node, it is assumed that no
mapping exists between children of the node and the parent address
space."
Assuming since in most cases root node have no "ranges" property, but
his child "SOC" have that property with defaults (0x0 x 0xffffffff).
So nodes which have property "ranges" or not, must be processed same
way. Right?
WBW
Hi,
I am not quite sure that I understand your question. What nodes are you
referring to and what to you mean by processing them the same way?
regards,
grzesiek
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
