On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:54:43AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10:14PM +0000, Ed Maste wrote:
> [...]
> > Note: if_tun had the same issue, addressed in SVN revisions r186391,
> > r186483 and r186497. The use of the condvar there appears to be
> > redundant with the functionality provided by destroy_dev.
> [...]
> > --- head/sys/net/if_tapvar.h Tue Sep 25 21:33:36 2012
> > (r240937)
> > +++ head/sys/net/if_tapvar.h Tue Sep 25 22:10:14 2012
> > (r240938)
> > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct tap_softc {
> > SLIST_ENTRY(tap_softc) tap_next; /* next device in chain */
> > struct cdev *tap_dev;
> > struct mtx tap_mtx; /* per-softc mutex */
> > + struct cv tap_cv; /* protect ref'd dev destroy */
> > };
>
> So maybe there is no need to add it?:)I'm sooo late, sorry. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://tupytaj.pl
pgpUhbw2TufOS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
