On 25.10.2012 19:54, Andre Oppermann wrote: > I still don't agree with naming the sysctl net.pfil.forward. This > type of forwarding is a property of IPv4 and IPv6 and thus should > be put there. Pfil hooking can be on layer 2, 2-bridging, 3 and > who knows where else in the future. Forwarding works only for IPv46. > > You haven't even replied to my comment on net@. Please change the > sysctl location and name to its appropriate place.
Hi Andre, There were two replies related to this subject, you did not replied to them and i thought that you became agree. So, if not, what you think about the name net.pfil.ipforward? > Also an MFC's after 2 weeks must ensure that compiling with IPFIREWALL_ > FORWARD enabled the sysctl at the same time to keep kernel configs > within 9-stable working. Yes, it will work like that. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
