On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:14:23PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 02:47:32AM +0000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > Author: alfred
> > > Date: Wed Nov 28 02:47:31 2012
> > > New Revision: 243645
> > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243645
> > >
> > > Log:
> > >   Don't allow minthreads > maxthreads.
> > >
> > Should not this be also checked in the kernel? Looks like nfssvc_nfsd
> > is
> > trustful:
> > 
> Well, since only root can do this and I can't think of why a sysadmin
> would use anything other than nfsd, I'm not sure it matters much?
> (But I don't see a problem with adding a sanity check in the kernel code.)
> 

It's nothing serious and I'm not going to insist, especially since this
is your code. I just prefer the kernel to be resistant if it does not
cost much.

I had something like this in mind (untested):
http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/nfs-threads-check.diff

-- 
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to