Juli, On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:05:28AM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote: J> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:07:25PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: J> > B> Just routine avoidance of namespace pollution. This is easy in such a J> > B> simple header. J> > J> > Sorry, with all respect, but I can't call including sys/types.h J> > a namespace pollution. J> > J> > Ok, even you force me to name it that way, still I would prefer J> > namespace pollution instead of handmade copy pasted typedefs. J> J> But Gleb, making such changes unilaterally is a bit of a leap. The J> project has mostly accepted Bruce's wisdom about trying to minimize J> and reduce namespace pollution. Now, this isn't a standard header so J> it's quite a bit less of a concern, but it's not no concern. If you J> think that we should reverse our trend on including J> namespace-polluting headers in system headers, we should discuss that J> on arch@, and it shouldn't be something that's done without any J> discussion or consideration. J> J> Should we expect further changes of this nature (and of the proposed J> nature removing __size_t and __ssize_t use) if you make changes to J> other headers as part of your work? Are you going to add J> <sys/types.h> to every header currently using <sys/_types.h> in a J> single go, or will you be doing that a little at a time when making J> functional changes?
Your suggestion? Typedef standard uint64_t manually as size_t and ssize_t already are done? Can you please define amount of standard types needed for kvm.h (or any abstract header) that would give a permission to include sys/types.h instead of typedefing all these types via a cut-n-paste surrounded by ifdefs? I am all against namespace pollution, but not when it comes to sys/types.h. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
