On Friday, May 03, 2013 4:35:41 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:55:47AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday, May 02, 2013 4:00:11 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > Author: kib > > > Date: Thu May 2 20:00:11 2013 > > > New Revision: 250193 > > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/250193 > > > > > > Log: > > > The fsync(2) call should sync the vnode in such way that even after > > > system crash which happen after successfull fsync() return, the data > > > is accessible. For msdosfs, this means that FAT entries for the file > > > must be written. > > > > > > Since we do not track the FAT blocks containing entries for the > > > current file, just do a sloppy sync of the devvp vnode for the mount, > > > which buffers, among other things, contain FAT blocks. > ... > > > Does this fix kern/62762? > > > > Supposedly yes, I even possibly have seen this PR before. > At least, it is understandable why do you remember about it now. > > I definitely do not want to take the approach of precisely calculating > the list of FAT blocks which needs to be synced.
No, that seems too painful. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
