On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:08:21 +0100, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:58:14PM +0000, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
Author: gnn
Date: Mon Nov 18 22:58:14 2013
New Revision: 258328
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/258328
Log:
Allow ethernet drivers to pass in packets connected via the nextpkt
pointer.
Handling packets in this way allows drivers to amortize work during
packet reception.
yes.
This is only a first step and eventually we should pass the entire
batch to the netisr handler to further reduce overhead.
Some of the followup emails suggested to change the argument from
struct mbuf * to something else.
I do think we should change it, but what we need is a struct with
head and tail pointers _and_ a counter, because sometimes the code
downstream may have to append the mbuf/batch to a queue,
and these extra fields would save iterating through the chain.
Related to this: at some point we should also address batching
in the transmit path, and for that we will eventually need to
introduce a 'more packets to come' flag to the API/mbuf so that
intermediate functions in the path will build batches before passing
them down.
cheers
luigi
The Apache webserver works like this also. It has a 'bucket'-list which
chains all data of a request and can also contain flush-commands in
between. Probably nice to look what they do and in what ways.
Ronald.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
