On Jun 2, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Juli Mallett <jmall...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Log: > Introduce a procedural interface to the ifnet structure. *snip* > Could you say a little bit about why so few reviewers? Sorry, my bad. The change was proposed and discussed on arch@ with pointers to the diff. Previous incarnations have been sent to net@ as well. I should have mentioned something along those lines. > Also, why "if_t" rather than an opaque "struct ifnet" to minimize churn, and > also not conflict with other "if_t" types one might be using in third-party > kernel modules. This has been covered on arch@ as well. It's probably best if I refer you to the email thread on arch@ so as to not pull emails out of context: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2014-May/015379.html > It's a pretty general name, and that seems problematic. In general am > enthused about this happening, just minor implementation concerns. It's appreciated. -- Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
