On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, John Baldwin wrote:
We might also consider removing support for 486sx CPUs and requiring an
on-CPU FPU for i386. If we do that we might able to use a common fpu.c
which would be even nicer.
You mean a common npx.c. The 'x' part of npx.c is much more descriptive
now than it was when the only extension was the floating point one. The
'n' part of npx.c is now too specific, but not as specific as the 'fp'
part of fpu.c.
Bruce
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
